Amazon is breaking compatibility with my internet TV and wants me to buy a new TV to keep using Amazon video. Are you kidding me?

Amazon is breaking compatibility with my internet TV and wants me to buy a new TV to keep using Amazon video. Are you kidding me?

Or I could by a Fire Stick. Which might be more appealing if I didn’t already have a Chromecast.

Doubt I’ll buy a Fire Stick to watch @AmazonVideo after you discontinue my TV app. Make your service work w/Chromecast & I’ll keep watching.

Whether you can pronounce its name doesn’t change its nutritional value.

Actors sometimes use stage names that are easier to pronounce than their real names, but it doesn’t change their acting ability.

Same goes for ingredients: Whether you can pronounce its name doesn’t change its nutritional value.

I mean, would you want to eat Brassica oleracea? No? How about kale? Same thing. Whether you can pronounce the name doesn’t matter.

I don’t use this app, therefore hardly anyone does. Even if it cites a 5-10 million install base…

I don’t use this app, therefore hardly anyone does. Even if it cites a 5-10 million install base.

It’s totally ridiculous someone would use this app for the first use case I can think of. So obviously it’s no use at all.

“Lots of people don’t use this” and “Hardly anyone uses this” aren’t the same thing. Don’t mix them up when deciding whether to drop it.

Maybe a million users don’t use a feature. Is that 1M out of 5M or 1M out of 1.1M? 80% usage vs. 9% is a big difference.

Even then, what if the 9% of users who use that feature are more active? (90-10-1 rule). Or they account for more revenue?