I don’t use this app, therefore hardly anyone does. Even if it cites a 5-10 million install base…

I don’t use this app, therefore hardly anyone does. Even if it cites a 5-10 million install base.

It’s totally ridiculous someone would use this app for the first use case I can think of. So obviously it’s no use at all.

“Lots of people don’t use this” and “Hardly anyone uses this” aren’t the same thing. Don’t mix them up when deciding whether to drop it.

Maybe a million users don’t use a feature. Is that 1M out of 5M or 1M out of 1.1M? 80% usage vs. 9% is a big difference.

Even then, what if the 9% of users who use that feature are more active? (90-10-1 rule). Or they account for more revenue?

perfectly logical explanation

I have always been fascinated by the Winchester House — but never heard this perfectly logical explanation for it. https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/mystery-house/ — @johannadc

Historian Mary Jo Ignoffo…believes that what drove Sarah Winchester to build was her desire to be an architect.

Sarah Winchester lived at a time when it was highly unusual for women to be architects. She wasn’t licensed, so her own home was the perfect place—and the only place—where she could practice architecture.

Whatever her motivations were, Sarah Winchester built a house with more than 150 rooms, 2000 doors, 47 fireplaces, 40 bedrooms, 40 staircases, 17 chimneys, 13 bathrooms, six kitchens, three elevators, two basements, and one shower. She spent nearly all of her life being an architect.

@johannadc Interesting idea! I’ve toured it a few times – it IS fascinating – but of course they play up the sensational take on it.