Weird jet-black deep-sea “footballfish” washes ashore.

Weird jet-black deep-sea “#footballfish” washes ashore.

LA Times (paywall):
Ultra-rare, bizarre fish that washed ashore near San Diego is California’s third this year

Birdsite:

On Wandering.shop

“The mayor of Portland, Ore., was tear-gassed by the U.S. government late Wednesday as he stood at a fence guarding a federal courthouse during another night of protest against the presence of federal agents sent by President Trump…”

“The mayor of Portland, Ore., was tear-gassed by the U.S. government late Wednesday as he stood at a fence guarding a federal courthouse during another night of protest against the presence of federal agents sent by President Trump…”

“The public should understand fully that the Republican Party has become the authoritarian party…unlimited executive power, executive domination of the other branches and selling our democracy to the highest foreign bidder.”

“The public should understand fully that the Republican Party has become the authoritarian party…unlimited executive power, executive domination of the other branches and selling our democracy to the highest foreign bidder.”

I love the tone in this bit from the Long Beach Comic-Con FAQ

To complete my costume, I carry a large battle-axe that I hone to razor sharpness every day. It’s cool for me to bring that, right?

Ummm, seriously? Props are one thing, but anything that could take an eye out, could hurt someone, or make the cops (or my mother) take it away from you, is not allowed. Please refer to our policies for more clarification.

Long Beach Comic-Con FAQ

On Wandering.shop

What is Yoda’s syntax in other languages?

What is Yoda’s syntax in other languages?

alenxa: Valuing low character count may lead to higher visceral response

RT @alenxa:

So I found this list of intellectual vs emotional words and the emotional ones are all shorter. Suggests that valuing low character count may lead to higher visceral response to that communication. Meaning, Twitter is designed so that we get worked up over it. Studies? Plz?

@alenxa Ooh, that’s an angle I hadn’t thought of before!

I’ve seen a lot of discussion of anger driving more engagement (which ad-supported services love) and someone suggested that it’s hard for most people to convey emotion in writing without exaggerating.

Now adding this factor…

I wonder if there’s a way to isolate other factors that have driven up the general anger level and compare the 140-character era to the 280-character era.

It does seem like the general level has been getting worse, but if that change decelerated things, it could support it.

Field Museum: Too. Much. Coffee! 😆 ☕☕☕☕☕

@sohkamyung@mstdn.io wrote:

Bwhahaha! More ‘coffee emotions’ in the twitter thread. 🙂

“Field Museum @FieldMuseum
Too. Much. Coffee. 😳”

“These watercolors were painted by Chinese artists during the mid-19th century and sold to Western customers in port cities of Hong Kong, Macao, and Canton. They’re imaginary birds but with some real #MondayMood feelings.”

#Humour #FieldMuseum #Coffee


@FieldMuseum

These are great!

On Wandering.shop

Whenever someone complains about newer Star Trek being “ruined” by social justice…

Yep. Whenever someone complains about newer #StarTrek being “ruined” by social justice or progressive issues, unlike the older series…I have to wonder whether they ever actually *watched* the show they claim to remember so fondly.

On Wandering.shop

Boosting brion@mastodon.technology: Found them! Five photos, taken in fading dusk light after panickingly searching for my camera …

Found them! Five photos, taken in fading dusk light after panickingly searching for my camera during what I sincerely hoped was a _test_ missile. 😉

Missile5

This was the October 3, 1999 antiballistic missile system test described here http://articles.latimes.com/1999/oct/03/news/mn-18259

Files scanned October 14, 1999, and sat around for aaaaages. 🙂

On modern computer UI

On modern computer UI

Nate Cull @natecull@mastodon.social:

Protip:

When designing a user interface, imagine some old woman using it, say Margaret Hamilton, and she’s clicking your app’s buttons and saying to you, as old people do,

“Young whippersnapper, when I was your age, I sent 24 people to the ACTUAL MOON with my software in 4K of RAM and here I am clicking your button and it takes ten seconds to load a 50 megabyte video ad and then it crashes

I’m not even ANGRY with you, I’m just disappointed.”

May 28, 2018 at 4:05 PM

Spam fallout

Interesting thread on the unintended consequences of fighting the spam wars. [dead link] via @gcupc

I would personally like to apologize for the antispam movement of the late 90s and early 00s. We did more harm than good. Nothing we did reduced the amount of spam significantly, and we created the centralization of email…

hoo boy, here comes some serious talk about fandom mentality

buckyballbearing:

amuseoffyre:

voltisubito:

hoo boy, here comes some serious talk about fandom mentality.

I feel like there’s a huge failing on readers’ parts to communicate to fic authors how much they appreciate their works or how much it affects them, unless the fic is “fandom famous” for some reason. sometimes it gets translated into demands (which are awful literally do not demand updates from an author ever).

more often than not, it gets translated into silence, and coming from a writer, the silence is probably the worst. you never know if they like it, you never know what the reader actually thinks about it. or even if they read it at all. and it’s… heartwrenching, and nervewracking and you start constantly questioning yourself and wondering if you’re actually good enough or if you belong. and you start comparing yourself. to the people who are popular, to the people with huge followings, to the people who get questions and art and compliments up the wazoo. and you start wondering if you should have bothered writing at all. in some cases you start begging. and in some cases, you do worse.

and it’s terrible. a writer shouldn’t have to beg. a writer shouldn’t have to only get attention when they’re frustrated or upset. a writer shouldn’t have to doubt themselves every time they pick up a pen or open their laptop. a writer should never feel so unimportant that they consider deleting their work–and do. and then be subjected to questions of why they deleted it.

(which, by the way, is kind of a rude thing to do. it’s their content, and they can do with it whatever makes them comfortable. and more than that–why wait until it’s gone to just suddenly unleash your appreciation for it?)

if, at this point, you are thinking, “well, writers shouldn’t write for attention anyway! writers should be writing for themselves!” then you are missing a Very Huge Point about the intricacies of and emotions behind creating art. of course art comes from the self, but art is meant to be shared. with people. like you. art is created for people to talk back to, to engage with, to live alongside–and yes, that in turn bolsters the creator’s own securities and motivation. it’s also a sad testament to the fact that we as a people have come to condemn the notion that anyone, especially content creators, should want attention at all.

and that’s toxic, and an awful mentality to have. (it’s also atrocious marketing. but, that’s another discussion for another time.)

what I’m trying to say here is this: a lot of this could be prevented by one simple thing. if you read a fic you like, *speak up about it.* make some kind of sign. about whether you like somebody’s work, or whether it excites you. reblog it to share with other people, gush in the tags, leave a comment/review if it’s on ao3 or ffn. (authors read tags as much as artists do, trust me.) kudos and likes are fine too, but like with any other kind of art, they’re very invisible. be vocal, y’all. spread the love.

and above all, *tell the author directly.* send them an ask, write a comment, tag them in an appreciation post. I can’t stress that enough. you’d be making someone’s day, relieving some securities, visible or not, instead of being complacent in this system, this mass way of thinking, that only popular writers deserve attention, that it has to be earned through working yourself raw instead of asked for. it causes these cliques and hierarchies and ultimately people start or keep maintaining this idea that people who are at the top deserve to be at the top, and people who get ignored deserve to be ignored. (which I have, in fact, heard people say, and that’s… I don’t even have a word for that.)

I just. something has to give, you guys. we have to stop doing this. we have to stop letting this happen. we have to be kind to our writers before they disappear.

and yes, you can reblog this post. in fact, I’d highly encourage it.

As someone who has been ficcing online since 1999, I can confirm that feedback is incredible for us. We like to know if there’s something you especially like or dislike. Kudos are nice and all, but is our characterisation okay? What about the dialogue? Did you find the plot slow/fast-paced?

I’ve been lucky lately, in that I have a solid core of people who tend to review a lot, but for nearly 7 years, I was in tiny, tiny, tiny fandoms where you were lucky if you got even one or two comments.

It’s encouraging when people do say something. Even if it’s just to say “i like when character X said Y, because it felt in character”. How do we know if we’re doing something right if no one tells us?

Fun fact: I realized that if I have time to send a text to my bff, I have time to leave a one line comment on fanfics

And yeah okay most of these wind up being something like “this was adorable, I love the way you showed [X] character’s conflict with [Y] by use of [Z]”

But hey if it’s the choice between that or nothing at all…

I’m not much of a fic reader these days, but I have to remember to give feedback on what I do read. I’ve settled into a pattern of saving blog posts and articles to read offline, which adds the extra step of remembering to come back later to comment. It might be efficient, but it keeps me quieter than I should be.

“If you enjoy learning, there’s no reason why you should stop at a given age”

ISAAC ASIMOV: A lifetime of learning

> If you enjoy learning, there’s no reason why you should stop at a given age….There’s only this one universe and this one lifetime to try to grasp it. And while it is inconceivable that anyone can grasp more than a tiny portion of it, they can at least do that much.

— Zen Pencils illustrates Isaac Asimov’s remarks on lifelong learning.